ColumbiaMagazine.com
Printed from:

Welcome to Columbia Magazine  
 



































 
Conway announces lawsuit filed against Marathon Petroleum

"When Ashland and Marathon merged in the late 1990s, the Federal Trade Commission said one state bore watching because the merger could create a lack of competition at the wholesale level. That state was Kentucky."
Click on headline for complete story

By Leland Hubert, Deputy Communications Director
News from the Office of Attorney General Jack Conway

Attorney General Jack Conway filed a lawsuit Tuesday, May 12, 2015, in federal court against Marathon Petroleum. The suit, filed in U.S. District Court in the Western District of Kentucky, alleges that Marathon engages in anti-competitive practices that lead to higher gas prices for consumers across Kentucky.

"For almost two decades, Marathon has been allowed to run rampant in Kentucky," Attorney General Conway said. "Marathon owns and operates the only refinery in Kentucky, and it maintains its wholesale monopoly by making retailers and other potential suppliers enter into contracts that are outright anti-competitive. This conducts harms everyone who buys gas in Kentucky."



As reflected in the complaint filed Tuesday, May 12, 2015, the Office of the Attorney General (OAG) believes Marathon violated state and federal antitrust laws by abusing the monopoly created when Marathon and Ashland Oil merged in 1998.

The suit alleges Marathon abused its monopoly, which led to higher gas prices for Kentucky consumers and businesses. The price disparity is most pronounced in the Louisville and Covington markets, where retailers are required to sell reformulated gas (RFG) during the summer months to reduce pollution emissions and improve air quality. Gas prices in Louisville are generally 20 to 30 cents higher than the rest of the state. When Louisville is compared to St. Louis, an RFG market of similar size in the region, gas prices averaged roughly 25 cents more per gallon in Louisville than St. Louis in the summer of 2014.

The Office of the Attorney General alleges that Marathon discourages competition by requiring independent retailers to sign unlawful supply agreements that eliminate wholesale competition, by forming exchange agreements with horizontal competitors that keep other suppliers from entering the Kentucky market, and by writing deed restrictions into the sales agreements of some properties sold by Marathon.

The Attorney General's investigation uncovered that some supply agreements Marathon enters into with retailers require retailers to purchase 100 percent of their RFG from Marathon, with penalties if the retailers fail to do so. The agreements also prohibit unbranded retailers from challenging Marathon's pricing.

Marathon executes exchange agreements with other major suppliers, which allows Marathon to supply branded stations with gasoline. Through these agreements, Marathon has limited competition. The competitors have no incentive to upgrade their refineries and supply infrastructure to produce and deliver RFG to Kentucky because Marathon is already supplying the stations with gasoline. Marathon further reduces competition by adding deed restrictions to some of the property parcels it sells. The restrictions prohibit the purchaser of the property from selling gas or operating a convenience store. Some of the restrictions have an exception that will allow for development of a gas station - if the station sells only Marathon gas.

History of the Merger & OAG Investigation

When Ashland and Marathon merged in the late 1990s, the Federal Trade Commission said one state bore watching because the merger could create a lack of competition at the wholesale level. That state was Kentucky. Attorney General Conway first started investigating gas prices in Kentucky in 2008 after it became clear that Kentucky stations were charging more for a gallon of gasoline than retailers in surrounding states. The disparity was even more significant in markets like Louisville and Covington, where retailers are required to sell reformulated gas during the summer months.

In 2008, Attorney General Conway forwarded his investigation to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). It declined to review the merger. In 2011, Attorney General Conway spoke with U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder and forwarded the investigation to the Department of Justice's Oil and Gas Price Fraud Working Group. In 2014, when new commissioners were named to the FTC, Attorney General Conway once again asked for a review of the merger and its impact on Kentucky.

"I am tired of waiting for the federal government to do its job and act on this case," Attorney General Conway said. "There is too much at stake, so we've taken matters into our own hands. We are standing up for Kentucky consumers and proceeding with our own antitrust case against Marathon."

To view a copy of the complaint, visit - http://goo.gl/A6n3vO

To view a video of the press conference, visit - https://youtu.be/Uu-eClJA3W0


This story was posted on 2015-05-13 04:10:13
Printable: this page is now automatically formatted for printing.
Have comments or corrections for this story? Use our contact form and let us know.



 

































 
 
Quick Links to Popular Features


Looking for a story or picture?
Try our Photo Archive or our Stories Archive for all the information that's appeared on ColumbiaMagazine.com.

 

Contact us: Columbia Magazine and columbiamagazine.com are published by Linda Waggener and Pen Waggener, PO Box 906, Columbia, KY 42728.
Phone: 270.403.0017


Please use our contact page, or send questions about technical issues with this site to webmaster@columbiamagazine.com. All logos and trademarks used on this site are property of their respective owners. All comments remain the property and responsibility of their posters, all articles and photos remain the property of their creators, and all the rest is copyright 1995-Present by Columbia Magazine. Privacy policy: use of this site requires no sharing of information. Voluntarily shared information may be published and made available to the public on this site and/or stored electronically. Anonymous submissions will be subject to additional verification. Cookies are not required to use our site. However, if you have cookies enabled in your web browser, some of our advertisers may use cookies for interest-based advertising across multiple domains. For more information about third-party advertising, visit the NAI web privacy site.