ColumbiaMagazine.com
Printed from:

Welcome to Columbia Magazine  
 



































 
Feedback: To criticism of airport board

Manager of Columbia-Adair County Airport responds to criticism of airport board for not allowing access for a proposed fly-in community

Editor, ColumbiaMagazine.com:

In response to Mr. Miller's submission to Columbia magazine: Does Mr. Miller understand the compexities of dealing with state and federal government where it concerns airport regulation and the safety of the population?

My name is John Ford and I am the volunteer airport manager for the Columbia-Adair county airport. Plan A for the airport has and always will be for the lengthening of the runway. Industry will not locate in a town with a runway of 2600 feet such as we have.



The reason they won't is because they cannot fly corporate aircraft safely into a runway of our size, which means that if a manufacturing plant goes down and they need to fly in support personnel they have to land elsewhere, rent a car and probably a hotel room, and what was a one day ordeal now becomes a two or three day job.

Why locate in a town with a 2600 ft strip when there are plenty of 4 and 5 thousand ft strips out there? Now you mentioned installing a gate on the north side of the runway to attract homeowners, when in reality the more that that land is developed the more it will cost to lengthen the runway because the longer the runway gets, the wider it has to be. The wider the runway, the more property has to purchased, and developed land costs a lot more than undeveloped land.

So the gate on the north side of the runway, although is not out of the question, would not be the prudent course to take for the benefit of the entire population of Adair county.

It would have two consequences because of the added cost of expansion in a developed area, first it would virtually insure that the airport not be expanded until the population reaches a certain density, by state estimations approximatly 20 to 25 years and second if the gate situation is not properly handled it would leave the taxpayers with another burden, something I as a taxpayer am not willing to do unless directed by city and county leaders to specifically do so.

I have been studying airports that have successfully had through the fence operations and if properly handled it can be a positive influence on a local economy, but as a general rule of thumb through the fence operations are frowned upon by state and federal government simply because of the safty concerns of crossing the runway.

I would personally like to invite anyone interested in attending a board meeting of the Columbia Adair county airport to come and sit in. These meetings are open to the public and are held the third Thursday evey month at the airport lounge at 6:00pm.

Please feel welcome to attend so that you won't cast about hurtfull uneducated remarks that does no one any good. The growth that you elude to will make money for a handfull of people, kill any chance at future expansion and have no real impact on the people who paid for and continue to pay for the airport: the taxpayers of Adair County.

Your community leaders and I have been trying very hard to expand your airport for the benefit of the entire community, not just a handful, and in the future if we see that a runway expansion project is not likely to happen, then a fly-in community--or plan B--as I like to call it is our next best option.

John Ford
Volunteer Manager
Columbia-Adair County Airport

To read the letter Mr. Ford is responding to, Click Here


This story was posted on 2007-01-10 15:16:30
Printable: this page is now automatically formatted for printing.
Have comments or corrections for this story? Use our contact form and let us know.



 

































 
 
Quick Links to Popular Features


Looking for a story or picture?
Try our Photo Archive or our Stories Archive for all the information that's appeared on ColumbiaMagazine.com.

 

Contact us: Columbia Magazine and columbiamagazine.com are published by Linda Waggener and Pen Waggener, PO Box 906, Columbia, KY 42728.
Phone: 270.403.0017


Please use our contact page, or send questions about technical issues with this site to webmaster@columbiamagazine.com. All logos and trademarks used on this site are property of their respective owners. All comments remain the property and responsibility of their posters, all articles and photos remain the property of their creators, and all the rest is copyright 1995-Present by Columbia Magazine. Privacy policy: use of this site requires no sharing of information. Voluntarily shared information may be published and made available to the public on this site and/or stored electronically. Anonymous submissions will be subject to additional verification. Cookies are not required to use our site. However, if you have cookies enabled in your web browser, some of our advertisers may use cookies for interest-based advertising across multiple domains. For more information about third-party advertising, visit the NAI web privacy site.