ColumbiaMagazine.com
Printed from:

Welcome to Columbia Magazine  
 



































 
Appeals court rules in favor of Commonwealth Atty Gail Williams

'Facts in the case are not complex and largely undisputed.'
Click on headline for facts in the case and court's conclusion

By Larry Smith, The WAVE, 92.7

Columbia, KY, Attorney Gail Williams' residency qualification to serve as Commonwealth Attorney in the 51st Judicial District has been affirmed by the Kentucky Court of Appeals.

The ruling was entered Tuesday, March 5, 2013, following hearings before Court of Appeals Judges Keller, Taylor and Van Meter, in the case of Ronney Hatter, appellant, vs. Gail Williams, appellee.



The action affirms an earlier ruling in Adair Circuit Court.

In the ruling the judges wrote:
"This appeal challenges the judgment of the Adair Circuit Court that appellee Gail Williams was a bona fide candidate in the November, 2012 election for the office of Commonwealth's Attorney for the 29th Judicial Circuit. As he did in the circuit court, appellant Ronney Hatter alleges that Williams could not meet the constitutional residency requirements after the sale of his residence in Adair County with the intent to relocate in Boyd County. The circuit court concluded, however, that the mere sale of Williams' residence in Adair County, without the actual establishment of an actual residence in a different county, did not result in the forfeiture of Williams' Adair County residency, nor did it disqualify him from becoming a bona fide candidate for the Office of Commonwealth Attorney. We agree and affirm.

"The facts of the care are not complex and are largely undisputed. In May, 2012, Williams and his wife entered into a contract for the sale of their Adair County home and actually vacated the residence on July 27, 2012. In the course of the proceedings below, Willliams acknowledged that he and his wife purchased two parcels of land in Boyd County, KY, but maintained that they purchased the property from their daughter and her husband in order to help her with financing and the construction of a new home on the property. Although they signed a New Home Consultation document identical to one previously signed by their daughter and son-in-law, neither Williams nor his wife ever paid any funds related to the construction of the home, nor had Williams even seen the building lots prior to signing the document identical to the one signed by his daughter.

"Williams does not dispute that he and his wife rented a small apartment in Boyd County and placed some of the furniture that had been in their sold residence in storage there. He maintained, however, that they intended to utilize the apartment while visiting family in Boyd County and that other furniture had been placed in storage in Adair County. The trial court specifically noted that he nothing found in the record that would support a finding that Williams ever actually resided in the Boyle County Apartment.

"Williams also acknowledged that at the time he learned he had received his party's nomination for the office of Commonwealth Attorney, he and his wife were vacationing at a condo they owned in Florida. The Williamses thereafter cut their vacation short, returned to Adair County, and made arrangements to rent a small apartment in Columbia. Although Williams listed that apartment as his on his filing papers, they moved from that address after approximately two days and subsequently rented a small house with a contract to purchase.

"Based upon these facts, appellant hatter alleged that Williams was not an 'actual resident' of Adair County for "one year next preceding his election in the county and district that he was a candidate." Williams responded that Adair County has remained his "actual residentce" for at least the past twelve years and that he at no time established an actual residence outside of Adair County.

"On the basis of the evidence presented, the trial court concluded that Hatter had failed to meet his burden of showing that Williams had either factually or legally surrendered residency in Adair County and thus Williams must be construed to be a bona fide candidate for the office of Commonwealth Attorney. We agree and affirm.
The court decision sited situations in other residency cases and wrote: " . . . we find no basis for disturbing the decision of the trial court. Even if Williams had stated an intention in open court to relocate at some point in the future, his objective actions up to the present conclusively demonstrate that he did not follow through with that expressed intent.

"The following objective factors support the trial court's conclusion that Williams is a bona fide resident of Adair County: 1) Williams and his wife maintain their personal bank account in Adair County; 2) Williams maintains his business bank accounts in Adair County; 3) Williams maintains his driver's license and registration for all four of his automobiles in Adair County; 4) he registered and titled a travel trailer in Adair County after the sale of his home; an d5) he downsized, but did not completely close his law practice in Adair County.

"Based upon all of these factors, we conclude that the trial court correctly determined that Williams "resided" in Adair County as that term has been defined in Mobley and that there is absolutely no objective evidence that he ever established a residence in Boyd County or anywhere other than Adair County. According, the decision that Williams was a bona fide candidate for the office of Commonwealth Attorney is affirmed."


This story was posted on 2013-03-09 06:27:13
Printable: this page is now automatically formatted for printing.
Have comments or corrections for this story? Use our contact form and let us know.



 

































 
 
Quick Links to Popular Features


Looking for a story or picture?
Try our Photo Archive or our Stories Archive for all the information that's appeared on ColumbiaMagazine.com.

 

Contact us: Columbia Magazine and columbiamagazine.com are published by Linda Waggener and Pen Waggener, PO Box 906, Columbia, KY 42728.
Phone: 270.403.0017


Please use our contact page, or send questions about technical issues with this site to webmaster@columbiamagazine.com. All logos and trademarks used on this site are property of their respective owners. All comments remain the property and responsibility of their posters, all articles and photos remain the property of their creators, and all the rest is copyright 1995-Present by Columbia Magazine. Privacy policy: use of this site requires no sharing of information. Voluntarily shared information may be published and made available to the public on this site and/or stored electronically. Anonymous submissions will be subject to additional verification. Cookies are not required to use our site. However, if you have cookies enabled in your web browser, some of our advertisers may use cookies for interest-based advertising across multiple domains. For more information about third-party advertising, visit the NAI web privacy site.